Quick correspondence for the review

imageプラグインエラー : ご指定のファイルが見つかりません。ファイル名を確認して、再度指定してください。 (QUick respondance.png)
Hiro created a handover document. He had Joe review his document. As a result, Joe pointed out about the important revision for the document. Hiro recognized the necessity of correction, but had many other jobs as well.

{Although it is necessary to reflect it in the handover document, since other tasks also exist, the priority order of reflection in the handover document is lower and tends to be postponed.
}
The correction content in the review is minor and ends in about 5 minutes. In addition, there was no particular urgent thing in other work, and it was possible to respond to reviews at any time

Avoid the omission of response to the review by correcting the matters pointed out soon.

Hiro received an indication from Joe and immediately made corrections to the handover document.
As a result, Hiro did not forget about dealing with the revision. Hiro were able to hand over the document that reflected the review to Kei.

By executing this pattern, it is possible to reliably generate the effect of the Review for the documents of handover. If this pattern can not be executed, it is necessary to manage countermeasures to the review based on the Update history and to prevent omission.

タグ:

+ タグ編集
  • タグ:

このサイトはreCAPTCHAによって保護されており、Googleの プライバシーポリシー利用規約 が適用されます。

最終更新:2016年12月23日 19:10
添付ファイル